Thanksgiving Dinner free essay sample

Many people yearn for various types of holiday events. These events may be in the summer, fall, winter, or spring time. Some find carving a pumpkin exciting, others enjoy hunting for eggs delightful, and even wearing green to be suspenseful. Considering the fact these are very popular holiday events, there is one I enjoy the most. Thanksgiving dinner is my favorite holiday event, because I enjoy setting the table, reuniting with family members, and eating all the delicious food. First, to initially start this gathering, I enjoy setting the table while dinner is being cooked. Nevertheless, the preparation time takes about five hours. For years, it has been a tradition for me to set the table. First, I place the burnt orange table cloth on the Maplewood table. Then I get the dinnerware out of the china cabinet. After washing the silverware, plates and cups, I place them in the correct order on the table. We will write a custom essay sample on Thanksgiving Dinner or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Lastly, I set the centerpiece on the table for the final touches. The table is now ready to be eaten on. The process of setting the table helps me feel helpful, and it makes Thanksgiving one of the best holidays because that is one less thing my mother and grandmother have to worry about. Next, reuniting with my family members during holiday events is always breath taking. Around this time, the seasoned and the new family members, come around and give an update of the latest news. This is where all the emotions take place. Sometimes, there is laughter and maybe even crying, but at the end of the day, there is always joy. Therefore, I would never trade hearing stories that have been passed down throughout our generations. Some of the stories taught me lessons, while others made me proud. However, it leaves me with a smile on my face. For this reason, being reunited with my family makes Thanksgiving Dinner so rare because that is when the whole family gathers around instead of the immediate family. Finally, it is now time for me and my family members to eat all of the delicious food my grandmother has prepared. Each year my grandmother makes my favorite meal. As a matter of fact, she made it large enough for everybody to take a plate home. This meal consists of turkey, ham, macaroni and cheese, yams, and dressing. Her specialty is greens and cornbread. My grandmother also makes plenty of dessert. Even though I may be full, I reach for another bite, knowing my eyes are bigger than my stomach. After it is all said and done my stomach is happy. My grandmother’s cooking is just like a food paradise. I like the food at Thanksgiving more than the food at other holidays because it seems more as a feast than a regular dinner. To close, Thanksgiving dinner is my favorite holiday event because I enjoy setting the table. Also, reuniting with my family members brings joy to my heart. Finally, eating all the delicious food my grandmother prepared leaves me and my stomach with a big smile. Therefore, these are the reasons Thanksgiving Dinner is my favorite holiday event.

Charismatic Theology Mission in the Spirit

Charismatic Theology Mission in the Spirit Introduction Theology should reflect a form that God chooses to manifest Him to humanity in the contemporary society. In that way, humanity is faced with the challenge whether there has to be Charismatic theology in the modern Christian society. In a bid to establish a theology, there must be talks concerning God, but this should be handled in a critical manner.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Charismatic Theology: Mission in the Spirit specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This translates that the apprehension of God generated becomes the formulae in tackling the dilemma the contemporary religious fraternity manifests to theology. Moreover, the theology that develops must also reflect the tradition of the religious fraternity from which it emanates. The theology must also mirror the manner in which God has been presented concerning the religious past1. Consequently, to be Charismatic entails how humanity acknowl edges the existence of the Holy Spirit. In practice, charisma entails receiving and presenting the works of the Holy Spirit to the contemporary society. In other words, Charismatic is a term referring to Christians who hold the notion that the doings of the Holy Spirit experienced in the early Church, such as miracles, tongue speaking, and healing, are also promises to the modern Christians. Therefore, to be genuinely charismatic, a doctrine should assume its meaning from the basis of the existence of the Holy Spirit as transcribed in the scriptures. Thus, a charismatic theology needs to consider the experience of the existence of the Holy Spirit as manifested in the Holy Scriptures2. It is only through the working of the Holy Spirit that a charismatic doctrine is established. Contrary to this claims, theology is seen to bring a misunderstanding about God and may fail to influence the believers. This paper seeks to show that the doctrine often spread within the Charismatic movement regarding self-imparted uniqueness, is widely uninformed and unbiblical. Since the movement accredits itself as sent by God to continue with his divine undertakings, it does not grant it a Christian experience. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the various controversies surrounding the Charismatic doctrine as well evaluate diverse opinions from different quarters sharing or refuting the claims of the Charismatic movement. Much attention will focus on St. Paul’s perspective of spiritual gifts as it is written in 1 Corinthians 12- 4. Eventually, this paper will assess whether the Scriptures affirm exceptional Charismatic gifts to the modern Church. Background information The proliferation of the Charismatic renewal can be traced in the early 1960s3. The idea of filling with Holy Spirit diffused swiftly via the mainstream denominations. Many conventional churches were highly influenced by the Charismatic renewal, and later independent Charismatic churches started to emerg e. Currently, most Charismatics have shifted from the mainline denominations to independent Charismatic churches.Advertising Looking for research paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Following their break from the mainline denominations, these churches abandoned the doctrinal traditions that shaped them and then formulated others that guide the modern Charismatic. Following this freedom, the church started to transform in many ways. Apparently, charismatics of diverse faith and beliefs exist all over the world making it difficult to define the movement. Despite the fact that many people have joined the Charismatic movement, there are still problems that face this movement. Most Charismatic argues that their teachings supplement the traditional teachings. The distinctive contentions In the current decade, Charismatic Christians have experienced vast criticism by both Christians and non-believer s. Just because the Charismatic movement or rather belief is widely spreading does not imply that its entire creed is justified. It is critical to consider the scriptures and examine the Church background in tackling the theological dilemma that is brought forth by the Charismatic values, practices, and beliefs4. It is highly disputable claiming of a second blessing or speaking in tongues as a proof of being filled with the Holy Spirit. Moreover, some of the gifts of grace and miracles are bizarre. In essence, the Holy Spirit dwells in the souls of all true believers, and this is not always evidenced by divine powers. The miracles manifested in the Bible were accrediting the scriptures. The â€Å"primary theological distinctiveness of the Charismatic movement includes speaking in tongues, the baptism in the Holy Spirit, the power of healing, and the importance of having a personal experience†5. These factors have contributed to the movement’s proliferation and populari ty. While everyone cherishes growth and change, these two attributes cannot be employed as evidence for divine accredits. False religions and cults have also enjoyed massive growth and popularity. Regarding blessings and worldly possessions, Charismatics believe in a Christian life that is far much better than a non-Christian life. They claim that their faith leads them to riches, better health, and joyful lifestyle. However, it is clear that many Charismatics have good health, worldly possessions, and happiness6.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Charismatic Theology: Mission in the Spirit specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The promise of good health and material possession has made new converts eager to abandon their ways to join the Charismatic theology for a better life. Unlike Charismatics, Evangelicals indicate that God is not fascinated by worldly things. For Evangelicals, the Christianity should not ent ail worldly possessions but heavenly wealth granted freely upon salvation. Thus, this claim is misleading for anyone to believe that the Christian faith will unconditionally result in wealth, happiness, and good health. Thus, Christians should expect it but the absence of such blessings should not mean the absence of God. Both non-believers and Evangelicals have condemned such focus on worldly riches as diverting believers away from heavenly riches promised in the Scriptures. Evangelicals hold that Christ is the light all Christians need and promise for worldly prosperity manifests serious theological error7. Common viewpoints held by Charismatics Undoubtedly, Charismatic Christians demonstrate a high knowledge of the Scriptures but they often fail to abide by its content. In most instances, Charismatic Christians rely on what they believe rather than what is written in the scriptures. During the apostolic times, those who joined the faith in Christ went through water baptism. Howev er, they also expected to go through a second step involving baptism with Spirit. The baptism in the Holy Spirit was highly valued as it was evidenced by characteristics of the Spirit particularly tongue speaking. The many gifts of the Holy Spirit transcribed in the Bible are also promises of the modern Church. Charismatics believe there are steps followed for one to attain baptism in the spirit. First, full commitment to Jesus Christ’s will, continuous prayer for the gift, waiting for the gift patiently and by faith, glorifying God for the gift, and freeing the Spirit by glorifying God in an unknown tongue. According to 1 Corinthians, as a Christian praise God in tongues, his/her mind rests as the spirit engages in prayer8. Despite the view that the Christian may not comprehend with the mind the utterances one says; there is a clear communication with the Lord. Charismatics also believe that speaking in tongues is an authority that Christ bestows upon the Christians to expre ss and exalt the Lord in a new language. Thus, this gift should be respected and encouraged in the church. Charismatics also view that speaking in tongues does not divide the Christian family since division is only brought by the sinfulness nature of man9.Advertising Looking for research paper on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Charismatics claim that the gift of healing is evidence that God exists, and there is the unquestioned truth about His word. Charismatics go further to show that the gift of miraculous healing is still availed to the modern Christian Church as it were in the first Church. However, since there is no ready reception in modern Church because of the influence of Western beliefs, Christians may not appreciate the divine intervention and the God’s healing. Tongue speaking Tongue speaking is a common practice to all Charismatics as well as Pentecostals. However, despite this being a common practice, there are variations in how these two denominations understand and define tongue speaking. Charismatics often believe in three varying applications of tongues. First, a massive number of Charismatics claim that speaking in tongues is the baseline proof of acquiring the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Charismatics believe that what transpired during the historical events as manifested in the teachings of Acts as extending to the contemporary Church. Second, â€Å"tongue speaking should be utilized in public worship for the elevation of the body†10. However, this tongue speaking must be meaningful and translatable to enhance clarity to all people. The comprehension that anyone experiences the baptism of the Holy Spirit should proof it by speaking in tongues is misleading since it blatantly contravenes the Bible. A third â€Å"use of tongues is meant for personal edification†11. In this case, tongue speaking is perceived as a personal connection language to God. These claims manifest a poor understanding of the Holy Scriptures. This assertion contributes to dividing the Christian family because not all Christians can speak in tongues yet they abide by the true word of God. Tongues are confirmed in various scriptures to be real languages rather than what Charismatics argue is special undefined personal prayer language. In most cases, it is agreeable that tong ues are meaningless to the listeners merely because they are presented in a foreign language. Thus, tongues should be translatable to bring meaning to the listeners. According to 1 Corinthians, 14:12-13, Paul emphasizes the need to interpret tongues12. In this passage, Paul claims that anyone who uses tongues edifies himself. The Charismatics misinterprets this passage since Paul is defining a person who uses tongues in public worship without an interpreter. However, tongue speaking in a Church without an interpreter does not benefit anyone and results to self-edification. Charismatics should ensure that what speaking in tongues is not viewed as a primary tool that every Christian must possess. Undoubtedly, it is essential to view tongue speaking as a foreign dialect but not meaningless utterances13. It is fundamental since it provides an objective criterion to establish if contemporary tongue speaking is valid or constructed utterances. Due to these contentions, many observers have called into question the authenticity of the Charismatic theology as a representative of the divine work of God. If contemporary tongues differ from the Biblical tongues, then it means that the Charismatic movement has abandoned true Biblical teachings. Unless, Charismatics can translate tongues, then tongues will have no impact in edifying the Church. Baptism of the Holy Spirit Spirit baptism is one of the cornerstone ratification of the Charismatic theology. Charismatics refer the Spirit baptism as an experience that one acquires following conversion. As evidenced in the book of Acts 11: 13-18, God is said to have poured out His Holy Spirit on the Gentiles, who had come to Him14. As shown in this passage, true believers in the early Church always acquired the baptism of the Holy Spirit free, but not as a reward gained, based on one’s doing. Contrary, Charismatics hold that Christians have to devote themselves in the course of seeking the Holy Spirit. Looking keenly at the events that transpired before the day of Pentecost, Jesus promised His disciples the Holy Spirit would descend to dwell in them. There were no requirements needed of the disciples before the Holy Spirit would pour on them. Jesus did not require them to pray or work hard for the gift of the Holy Spirit. There is no evidence in the Scriptures that some of the followers of Christ were declined the spirit due to inadequate preparation. The contemporary Christian Church should expect any gift from God, different or similar to those provided by the apostolic Church. However, with the massive spread of false prophets, it is critical for Christians to seek guidance from the Scriptures to know the true prophets guided by God. Charismatics admit that many members of the movement are taught the process of speaking in tongues, and others acquire the gift through prayer. During the apostolic times, tongue speaking was not learned or earned but God gave the gifts freely. However, training people to speak in tongues misleads the Christian community to believe of extraordinary need for having such gifts. The Holy Spirit shows Himself to the humanity through gifts with which He bestows the Christians. As mentioned in 1 Corinthian, 12: 8-10, such gifts include several tongues as well as the ability to interpret them15. These gifts are not meant for a particular group of believers, but rather to Christians who are given different gifts. The spiritual â€Å"gifts endowed by Spirit to every believer are meant to benefit the whole Church because Spiritual gifts are granted for the common good†16. Prophecy The question whether God is still communicating with the modern Church through direct revelation is debatable. The Holy Scriptures in the book of Acts 2, 10 and 19 interprets the gifts of prophesy, healing or raising the dead as historical events that happened in apostolic times. Charismatics have caused the controversy as to whether these gifts are provided by God to His p eople in the modern society. Charismatics still hold that believers â€Å"still experience direct revelation from God†17. Most Charismatics refute the claim that contemporary prophecies should reflect the Scripture. Consequently, Charismatics underrate the New Testament prophecy as a lesser revelation. In a bid to solve this controversy, it is essential to understand what prophecy is. True prophecy manifests the words of God passed to humanity via a prophet. Thus, a real prophet must speak the correct doctrine in the name of the real God. Additionally, all that is prophesied must happen with time. If a person proclaimed as a prophet and never makes a genuine prophecy, then there is no point to believe that person has a gift of prophecy. The Old Testament prophets manifested the qualities of real prophets because what they said happened. The teachings of Luke â€Å"present the story of the gifts of the Spirit as historical events and no attestation that such gifts are also pl edged to the future generations†18. However, the Church should expect that the Holy Spirit would provide it with the blessings that are required to develop the Church over years. Besides, God has other reservations for His people rather than those He gave the early Church. The contemporary Church must refrain from the assumption that because the Holy Spirit granted Daniel, the authority over Lions, the modern church should also expect God to provide such powers. Similarly, the modern Church should not argue that since the early Church had Christians with the gift of tongues, thus the modern Church must be endowed with matching gifts. When it comes to physical healing of the body, God wants Christians to focus on earthly ways that God has offered to for healing of the physically challenged. In this case, Christians are taught that they are yet in the existence of glory where pain and suffering will cease. Furthermore, Christians should never expect to undermine the control of G od, through prophecy or prayer. The Charismatics should refrain from thinking that they have the power to avoid suffering because they still live in a realm where sin and suffering are prevalent. Conclusion Even in the early Church, not all believers were granted with the gifts of prophecy or tongue speaking. Thus, the modern Christian Church must be cautious not to impart excessive concerns on such gifts. For instance, when tongue speaking is viewed as the key feature it results into a perception that undermines other benefits of the Holy Spirit. Through the Holy Spirit, the Christian fraternity is united to fellowship together in the glorification of God. Thus, it is lamentable that the Charismatics differentiate between those Christians baptized with the Spirit and other Christians. This divisive inclination fosters false belief that the former include a spiritually advanced cadre of Christians. The ultimate approach to determining a Spiritual gift should entail seeking whether i t builds the Church and abides by the written word of God. Christians should assess the impact that speaking in tongue has in building the Church. At times emphasizing on speaking in tongues might have negative effects to unbelievers for it might cause them think they are troubled. In many cases, these Spiritual gifts have been misused but these should not be used to discredit that such gifts exist. God has the power to bless the people with gifts that build the Church to future generations. Since they are no compelling Biblical evidence to discredit the existence of these gifts, it is upon the Christians to seek guidance from the Bible to understand genuine gifts. In a bid to reduce the confusion pertaining Charismatic theology, it is essential for Christians to learn from the Scripture and let it guide them in every matter. Bibliography Middlemiss, David. Interpreting Charismatic Experience. London: SCM Press, 1996. Mühlen, Heribert. A Charismatic Theology. London: Burns Oate s, 1978. Peppiatt, Lucy. â€Å"New Directions in Spirit Christology: A Foundation for a Charismatic Theology.† Journal of Theology 117, no. 1 (2014): 3-10. Pinnock, Clark. â€Å"The Work of the Spirit in the Interpretation of Holy Scripture from the Perspective of a Charismatic Biblical Theologian.† Journal of Pentecostal Theology 18, no. 2 (2009): 157-171. Poloma, Margaret. â€Å"Practical Theology: Charismatic and Empirical Perspectives.† Pneuma Journal 29, no. 2 (2007): 335-336. Quash, Ben. Found Theology: History, Imagination, and the Holy Spirit. Oxford: Bloomsbury, 2014. Spawn, Kevin. â€Å"Knowing the Holy Spirit through the Old Testament.† Pneuma Journal 30, no. 1 (2008): 174-175. Stronstad, Roger. The Charismatic Theology of St. Luke. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2012. Thomas, John. â€Å"The Charismatic Structure of Acts.† Journal of Pentecostal Theology 13, no. 1 (2004): 19-30. Williams, Rodman. Renewal Theology. Grand Rapids: Acade mie Books, 1988. Footnotes 1Heribert Mühlen, A Charismatic Theology (London: Burns Oates, 1978), 24-25. 2Lucy Peppiatt, â€Å"New Directions in Spirit Christology: A Foundation for A Charismatic Theology,† Theology 117, no. 1 (2014): 7. 3David Middlemiss, Interpreting Charismatic Experience (London: SCM Press, 1996), 41-42. 4Ben Quash, Found Theology: History, Imagination and the Holy Spirit, (Oxford: Bloomsbury, 2014) 76. 5Kevin Spawn, â€Å"Knowing the Holy Spirit through the Old Testament,† Pneuma Journal 30, no. 1 (2008): 174. 6Clark Pinnock, â€Å"The Work of the Spirit in the Interpretation of Holy Scripture from the Perspective of a Charismatic Biblical Theologian,† Journal of Pentecostal Theology 18, no. 2 (2009): 159. 7Margaret Poloma, â€Å"Practical Theology: Charismatic and Empirical Perspectives,† Pneuma 29, no. 2 (2007): 335. 8Poloma, Practical Theology, 336. 9Roger Stronstad, The Charismatic Theology Of St. Luke (Grand Rapids, MI: Bake r Academic, 2012), 65-68. 10Ibid, 71. 11Ibid, 71. 12Rodman Williams, Renewal Theology (Grand Rapids, Mich: Academie Books, 1988), 15-17. 13John Thomas, â€Å"The Charismatic Structure of Acts,† Journal of Pentecostal Theology 13, no. 1 (2004): 19-30. 14Ibid, 19-30. 15Stronstad, The Charismatic Theology, 19-20. 16Ibid, 72. 17Ibid, 78. 18Quash, Found Theology, 93.

Materials Handling Policy Development Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Materials Handling Policy Development - Essay Example Methods used to protect employees should be based on the proper safety measure. This is by the use of protective clothing as discussed below: It is vital to wear suitable protective gloves, aprons and boots when handling sulphuric acid as it is a corrosive material. If sulphuric acid gets into contact with the skin immediately, the first step that should be done is that the affected area should be thoroughly washed with plenty of water. It may also be essential to seek medical care (Greenberg & Cramer, 2011). Moreover, when handling this material, any employee should avoid generating vapors. All employes ought to immediately report leaks or failures of the safety equipment such as ventilation system. Also, all employees ought to avert accidental interaction with irreconcilable chemicals. Never add water to a corrosive sulphuric acid being an example. If product is moved to another vessel, ensure new vessel is appropriate for the product. Never reuse empty vessels, even if they appear right to use (Louie, 2008). In case a spill or leak of sulphuric acid occurs, one should follow instructions given by emergency service responders and local authorities. Keep products and the place out of reach of children (Louie, 2008). Gallons of this chemical should be stored safely to reduce the risk they pose to and employees handling them. Store this corrosive chemical in an area that is: cool, dry, away from direct sunlight and away from ignition sources and heat, separate from irreconcilable materials. Regularly review for physical signs of crystallization or damage (Seufert, 2014). All hazardous chemical containers like sulphuric acid are required to be branded with the chemical name, danger warnings and how to handle incidences such as spilling of the acid. The manufacturers label should be kept unbroken until the bottle, or the container has been emptied. When the chemical

U.S. History Origins 1816 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

U.S. History Origins 1816 - Essay Example In olden days, ships were the only mean of transport from one continent to the other. Explorers like Amerigo Vespucci and others explored the world on ships and went to many different and diverse places. Europe has many differences as compared to the Africa and America. The major reason that the New World is separated from the Old World is that the ocean between the Europe and America was considered to be vast and endless. The maps at that time were depicted to have no knowledge of the Western Hemisphere (Elliott, 24-67). On the other hand, Asia stretches for long and it was considered that the continent that was discovered by the explorer Amerigo Vespucci was a part of the Asia not a separate continent. People thought, it was in appropriate to initiate trade with the similar continent through another part of the continent. The Native Americans (People residing in New World) were fully adapted to the local foods and were environment. None of them ever tried to cross the borders of th e region and they were adapted to the wind life of the New World. The people utilized the bone tools and live in the Stone Age while the Europe advanced much in technology. Results of Separation of the New World and the Old World The results of the separation of the New World and the Old World encouraged the European colonies to localize in the region and settle there with the domesticated crops and animals. The natives of the New World are less likely to go and leave the native place due to the social and communication separation between the residents of the new world and the old world. They were far from the known technology at that time. The native were unable to gain knowledge from the other world parts and thus they have fixed knowledge about how to hunt and what to hunt for them to eat. The new world natives are far from the societal laws and regulation and communal systems that were followed by the old world countries at that time. They have no knowledge of arts and behavior and remain uncivilized due to the communication gap between the new world and old world countries. The native of the new world have no knowledge about the domestication of the animals and plants for their food and thus have no knowledge about the medication in case of illness and had food scarcity is case of droughts. Some tribes were settled on the banks of the rivers to have the constant supply of food and water. The natives of the new world were less likely to build large houses and lead their lives in open sky or in small canopies that can be easily transported from place to the other. The natives of the new world survive on hunting the forest’s wild animals and women in the tribe collect the edible plants and fruits available in the forest and the surroundings. While, the old world countries survived mostly on the domesticated plants like the most crops and the domesticated animals like cows, chickens, pigs, goats, sheep, etc. Domestication of the plants and animals play ed an important role in the development of the technology and the food resources (De la Vega, 78-88). Before the domestication of animals and plants, people used to survive on hunting and collecting wind plants and fruits from the forests. The natives of the new world worried more about the food while the old world concentrated on the exploration and enhancement of technology. There are several reasons for the

A critical discussion of the urban experience in relation to the issue Essay

A critical discussion of the urban experience in relation to the issue of gender - Essay Example ‘Men and women’s conception, experience, and use of urban space is different’ (McDowell, 1983: 59). Bondi claims that ‘urban space creates, imposes, reflects and distinguishes divisions between men and women’s experiences, control and use of public and private spaces in urban environments’ (1998: 161). The study of gender and geography has, since the late 1970’s been interested in the differing experiences of men and women in the city. For example, feminist geographers including McDowell (1983) and Darke (1996) have investigated how land use in the city has impacted on the way men and women live their lives, and how the role of gender impacts on the day to day experiences of men and women within the urban environment. This essay aims to explore how gender roles are played out within urban spaces. ‘Women writing on cities have arrived at differing conclusions’ (Darke, 1996: 88). Wilson (2001) for example experiences cities as exciting and liberating public environments and an escape from patriarchal imposed identities. However, she also acknowledges that ‘in recent years feminist have argued that there could never be a female flanuer†¦urban scene was at all times represented from the point of view of the male gaze: in painting and photographs men voyeuristically stare, women are passively subjected to the gaze’ (Wilson, 1992: 56). The differing viewpoints between feminist geographers themselves highlight the complex nature relating to studying gender in the urban environment. ... Male domination led to men being the rulers, decision makers, generals and cultural leaders. Women were often subjected to domestic roles, hidden from public space. The introduction of women’s voting rights and gender equality laws went some way to rebalance gendered experience of the city as the 20th Century drew to a close. ‘However, even though legal barriers to women’s access to jobs and particular buildings have been removed, women are still excluded and made to feel uncomfortable in public space’ (Darke, 1996: 92). For example, Cockburn (1983) highlights how women receive not so subtle behavioural signals that tell them they are trespassing on the territory of men, e.g. wolf whistles on the street, sexual harassment in the work place and street posters depicting half naked women. Various authors including Darke (1996: 88) and Lewis et al (1989: 215) have highlighted that zoning patterns, based on stereotypical gender roles have created divisions betwe en gendered experiences of the city, in which men control public space, hence becoming more specialised and important components of identity in the public sphere, whilst women are confined to private spaces. This is emphasised by Bondi ‘an important association remains between masculinity, public space and the city, on the one hand, and between femininity, private space, and the suburbs on the other hand’ (1998: 162). The ‘city of zones’ therefore compartmentalises activities such as work, leisure, travel and home life. Women are primarily seen as wives and mothers, whilst men are viewed as the breadwinner, whose job it is to go out into the public realm to earn a living and provide for ‘his family’. Darke’s (1996)

What Makes It An Imagist Poem English Literature Essay

What Makes It An Imagist Poem English Literature Essay When one thinks of the conventions associated with a rose they think of love. This is the symbol a rose endeavours. However this meaning is not static and for many a rose symbolises many different things. In literary convention terms a rose is associated with delicate love, appreciation, romance, beauty and roses portray the positive feelings inside one. There are many different rose colours each portraying a certain meaning and in each case a positive meaning. While bearing these conventions associated with a rose in mind I am going to analyse H.D.s Sea Rose. H.D was a literary woman of the twentieth century who became profoundly interested in the imagist movement. H.D is a modernist poet and one can see from reading her poetry that there is strong feminist principles expressed throughout. Her poems came too early for an audience who were not ready to respond to these feminist principles (Pound, 1997-2010). One can characterise H.Ds poetry by the strength of her images, economy of language and use of classical methodology (Pound, 1997-2010, http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/234). The poetic form of imagism is clearly seen in H.Ds poems. Imagism was a huge part of modernist writing, it is a literary movement launched by British and American poets early in the 20th Century that advocated the use of free verse, common speech patterns, and clear concrete images as a reaction to Victorian sentimentalism (LoveToKnow Corp, 1996). H.D.s poem the Sea Rose can be seen as an imagist poem due to its expression of visuals images throughout the poem . These visual images can be seen through the clarity of expression throughout the poem. Imagism poetry aimed to replace muddy abstractions with exactness of observed detail, apt metaphors, and economy of language (Pound, 1997-2010, http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/5658). This new movement of imagist poetry has had a huge impact on many poets throughout the 20th Century. H.Ds Sea Rose poem is about much more than a rose. It reveals to the reader that one should look through the image to see the eternal condition and this is what imagist poets write about. The literary conventions that one associates the rose such as soft and the typical red rose of romanticism is not the same here, its not a soft rose but instead harsh(1), its not sweet like one would expect a rose to be but instead its acrid (15). Throughout the poem we are not told of the colour of this rose or indeed of any colour. One could say through this poem H.D is saying there is no exact meaning of a rose and that these symbols that one associate with a rose are not exact, however instead the rose itself defies its own symbolic representation. One can see the poetic form of imagism throughout the poem through H.Ds observed detail of the rose. This rose is a clear exposition of a single flower from the garden. As stated by Nelson the short, carefully measured free verse lines, together with the slightly archaic (though still direct) diction and the insistence on the sparseness of the flower tend to give the poem a simplicity and solidity, a feeling of the visual or sculptural realness of the sea rose-Sea Rose could almost be a poem of image and little more. (Nelson, 2000) Gender is also prevalent throughout Sea Rose. One could say that the first few lines of the poem symbolises the non-conforming woman of the twentieth century- the rose is harsh (1) and living on the boundaries of different worlds. There is a gender issue present, if one was to perceive this rose as the twentieth woman who was primarily a housewife and mother and only part of the private sphere but who is fighting to enter the public. When bearing this in mind, one can see the rose as been a metaphor for the movement of women into the public sphere and then one can see that the rose is portraying the rough time that women of this era have to go through to seek this independence, similar to the rose who is having a rough time caught between the sand and water. Just like the rose is caught in a drift (8) between the sand and water so too are these women caught in the drift (8) of a masculine society. The environment which this rose is placed is not stable as the tide it is constantly mo ving. The rose is been moved around by the sand which is been moved about by the sea. This can be seen as H.D portraying society, everyone is been flung (10) about by these more dominant forces which one can interpret as male forces. To me these dominant forces can be perceived as the patriarchal male society of the time. This is an imagist poem where nature is predominant, the climate in which surrounds the rose is not welcoming crisp sand that drives in the wind (12-13) just as society of the time is not welcoming of women entering the public sphere. The rose is in isolation single on a stem (7), alone in the wilderness. The rose can be seen as an allegory of a woman who too is similar to this rose who is alone in the wilderness and caught between two worlds. Through this analyse I hope I have conveyed that there is a deeper hidden meaning to be seen in H.Ds poem Sea Rose and given thought you a thought of what H.D may be trying to portray through this poem. While there are many different perceptions to be gotten from Sea Rose it is clear that H.D is talking about much more than a just a rose and instead the deeper meaning can be seen when one studies the object in isolation.

Media :: essays research papers fc

Media Awareness The case that I decided to focus on is an older abuse case, but it has recently been resolved in the courts. It is a child abuse case involving James and Bonnie Zeleski. They were both charged with abusing their infant daughter. The child was brought to the hospital with a fracture in each leg, a fracture in each arm, a thigh fracture, three broken ribs, a ripped esophagus, pneumonia, malnourished and several other cuts and bruises. The girl was transferred to an Omaha hospital. The father, James, was charged on June 3, 1998 with Class 4 Felony Child Abuse. His wife, Bonnie, was later charged and convicted of a Class 3 Felony. James was sentenced to three years probation and six months in jail. His wife was sentenced to 15 to 18 months in prison. I think that this case was fairly portrayed by the media. I know at the time, there were several letters to the editor and opinion printed on the subject, but the Grand Island Independent seemed to be fair and stick to the fa cts. It was a horrible crime and I think they did a good job being unbiased. I think that it is a good idea to publicize crimes like this. From my other studies, I have learned that the informal sanctions, public humiliation and shame, are far more effective than the formal sanctions in preventing crime. When people who are having a hard time dealing with being a parent see something like this in the media, they may stop to think about their actions. A good idea would be to run several articles on where parents can go to for help. The combination of the two, may help prevent this from happening to another child. As a mother I have a definite interest in this crime. I cannot even begin to understand how anyone could do something like that to someone so helpless. I am also interested in this case from the legal perspective and how the case was resolved in the court system. I personally think that the sentencing was very lenient. I think this is a good activity. I studied journalism fo r a while and I am very aware of how the media can distort a situation.